Maybe, but why would he delete the tweet? He could have just said he wasn't going to be able to give us this.
But anyway, I'm not sure how the document has to do with this discussion.
I'm just trying to say, Faber seems to have a history of saying things from his perspective, which doesn't necessarily line up with the actual idea. If you want this kind of info, you want to talk to Alastair Swinnerton.
All in all, I'm trying to say don't make these kinda conjectures and call them fact.