I feel like I'm somewhere inbetween here. It definitely looks good, and it was probably the right time to leave the futuristic setting in favor of returning to WWII.
On the other hand, it literally looks like every WWII video game ever made but with better graphics and more advanced technology. I get that's what most people probably wanted anyway, and I would lie if I said I wasn't intrigued about storming the beach of Omaha with Sledgehammers graphical engine. It's just that it's always the same battles over and over, every single time.
There's a lot more than just D-Day and such with WWII that never, or very rarely, gets to be portrayed and would be very interesting to be able to see. Like the Battle of Dunkirk, the Winter War in Finland, the occupations of both Norway and Denmark, the Warsaw Uprising, and many more battles and events.
As I said, I'm still interesting to see what Sledgehammer will bring to the table with this game. I just wish it wasn't all about the same battles that have been portrayed over and over again.