The “make it shorter” comment refers exclusively to the principle of “Don’t use ten words when three will do.”
You’ve picked specific pieces of what I said to counter but you haven’t countered the spirit of what I said, which is simply this: Your critique was not truly a critique in the sense that it was stream-of-consciousness. More importantly, your “jokes” do not come across as jokes when you’re in a position where you’re not being funny.
If i write a proper, objective critique, I’m not making jokes. At least, not in the way that would infer that I am calling out my audience in a negative way.
As for your presenting the norms of the MCU, you can do so without devoting an entire passage to establishing them. The onus is not on you to provide every piece of necessary context when comparing films - the reader must decide how relevant the comparison is and research/watch themselves for context. A mini essay on the comparison’s context is not needed - brevity is good.
As for your main question being why Danvers never asked why only SHE got a chip-thing, there’s also a certain amount of “special child” inherent in that. If you’re told “Hey, you’re special and this is to help you” and you have NO OUTSIDE INFLUENCE BECAUSE YOU LOST YOUR MEMORY, you’re probably not gonna go out of your way to question it too much. People like to be special.
The essence of my nitpicking comments is simply that for you, things that you feel need explanation are things I feel are easily inferred - and thus they feel nitpicky to me. I don’t -need- every single thing explained to me because I can suspend my disbelief long enough to enjoy it. Plus, a lot of things that you called out as making no sense are classic movie tropes, at which point calling out classic tropes that everyone can recognise that don’t necessarily detract from the movie is, in my eyes, nitpicking.
When I say that you failed to make this a proper critique out the gate, I’m referencing you feeling the need to disclaim your post. If you TRULY believed that you executed a critical, proper review than you shouldn’t have felt the need to post that disclaimer at the beginning, given that the likelyhood of someone on the site reading long enough to bother reporting it is low. Additionally, if you make a truly critical critique properly there would be no reason for anyone to report this post in the first place.
Last but not least, saying “Years went into making the movie so it’s definitely longer than the review” is irrelevant and dismissive - there are six hour long reviews of Star Wars Movies. This is the text equivalent of those, and therefore Holi’s statement stands true