I played Mario galaxy and Super Mario Bros, those were nice, but the style of the new one are weird and I dont like them,
I also played a metroid game, which one? Who knows, but I didnt like it
1 Like
There very different types of Metroid games, the gamecube ones are supposedly the best. Never knock something unless youâve given your best at giving it a shot. Itâs impossible to forna proper opinion of Fallout by playing Fallout Shelter. In the same vain, you canât form an intelligent opinion on Metroid Prime of you play Super Metroid or The Other M.
Also, you canât go knocking games you havenât even played yet. I almost didnât try Bioshock because of that. Today itâs my favorite shooter. Break down your boundaries.
3 Likes
Looks awesome
1 Like
Your opinion no longer matters to me.
Spider-Man, Super Mario Odyssey, and Metroid games were what got me the most excited this year.
4 Likes
It hurts my heart to see how much cringe there was for Lego Dimensions.
Iâm going to be honest I donât get the Spiderman hype. It looks like an overly quicktimey arkham clone.
Also, if you want something that can be summed up as âLife is Strange, except goodâ, watch Steins;Gate.
1 Like
I canât believe no one has mentioned that new Kirby.
1 Like
Hmmmm
1 Like
whoops i didnât see that
2 Likes
Bethesda probably won for meâŚ
âI have trash opinionsâ
Ftfy.
/s
If I had to rank E3 best shows it would be:
Devolver (they get honorary 1st place, it was far and away the most enjoyable, but they didnât actually announce anything so I canât really say they âwonâ.)
Nintendo (Nintendo by a mile had the best E3, everyone else showed 1-2 games that looked interesting, Nintendo pretty much only had interesting announcements, the only game I think people arenât really interested in is the pokken port.)
Ubisoft (no Aisha Tyler and a genuinely interesting game lineup puts them surprisingly high up this year.)
Microsoft (honestly the rest were all pretty meh, but Microsoft edged out the others with a few announcements)
Sony (again, meh, a few interesting announcements but sensory overload from the continuous trailers ended up blurring everything together.)
Bethesda (Iâm not interested in VR, few are interested in skyrim anymore, and no one cares about eso or ko hearthstone, if not for dishonored and wolfenstein I would have put be3 last.)
EA (originally EA was actually higher on the list, but when I thought about it, they really only announced one interesting game, since bf2 still just looks like âdice shooter 45 +stormtroopersâ, and EA reached the highest levels of cringe.)
2 Likes
What? Other than the wii maybe, they really arenât technologically innovative. (Even then the wii was weak as all get out) The switch is basically a Nvidia shield thatâs been redesigned. The switch is what the wii U shouldâve been and thatâs a console powered hand held. Theyâve dominated the hand held market for a while so it comes as little surprise that this would be their next integration. The new âmeme box x one x x one box xâ is innovative seeing as how powerful it is for a relatively low cost, although thatâs just technologically so.
But yes, I do agree, Iâd like not having their games be proprietary.
If you think 500 dollars is low cost, then hoboy how wrong you are. Nothing is low cost when it goes over 100 dollars.
1 Like
Technological innovation=/=power output
Technological innovation in gaming means to take a divergent path and create hardware that tries something new. Thatâs what innovation is all about. Taking something and going in interesting and risky places. Handhelds, dual screen gaming, motion controls, and hybrid consoles are all examples of new territory for faming as a whole at the times they were introduced.
Say what you will about Nintendo not chasing after the ideal pf being the most powerful console (that died with the gamecube, because despite it veing more powerful that the PS2 and XBOX, it didnât sell as well), at the very least theyâre great at taking bold risks. Microsoft and Sonyâs hardware is just following begins PCs. All of the innovation there happenes years before they make each new console.
1 Like
Nintendo is innovating when it comes to options for gaming experience. Play at home or outside, with one or multiple players, on the go or by sitting, with regular controller or freehand controllers. Nintendo definitely gives more options right of the back when it comes to how you want to play games.
Also its 2010s, graphics are no longer a wow factor, we come to a almost same level of graphic quality. Whats more important is that the gameplay is enjoyable. The selling tropes of 4k are rather pointless and dumb, cause by this point standard 60 fps is more important.
I like beautiful artstyles and graphical prowess, but Iâm still always willing to play old games even if it takes time to grow accustomed to dated visuals.
A lot of people also mistake art style for graphical capabilities. A game could have the potential for âgreat graphicsâ but all of that advanced lighting means squat if the artstyle isnât good at all. Textures make or break a game a lot more than graphics do.
1 Like
but
p a i d m o d s
i guess $500 is low for an âupgradeâ that just runs better.
yep, totally.
/s of course
But Elder Scrolls LegendsâŚ
But Minecraft in 4k
Bleh, Iâll just say that youâll have a hard time finding something with that much power for that price anywhere, unless youâre able to find some used high end PC components for low prices. Do I particularly care for xbox stuff? No, not really. Bringing that level of performance to a $500 price range is respectable though, 4k 60fps is a lot harder to acheive than you may at first think. Do I think all their decisions are good ones? Noooooope. Has nintendo also jumped on the bandwagon of dlc, season passes, and paid online where it started a few years back? Yes, yes it has.
Hell, I like most of nintendoâs games. It would be nice if they were on other platforms though, being proprietary means I have to buy a console specifically to play them, but news flash, that console is pretty much only nintendo games. Also, I wouldnât call a powerful handheld innovative, itâs always been an idea for a handheld system to be as powerful as a home system, including a display out on a handheld that powerful just seems like a logical thing to do. The switch isnât new technology either, itâs using an nvidia tegra chip, which has been around since 2015.
Thatâs not to say I donât like the concept of a powerful handheld. I absolutely do, calling it innovative is a bit of a stretch though.