I’m not gonna touch on defending myself at this point, because it would only cloud up the current most pressing matter.
What we have here is a situation comparable to this. We have four men against the wall, and a gun with one bullet in it. Backup won’t come until we kill someone.
Guys 1, 2, and 3 all were found at the crime scene, while guy 4 is confirmed to be a serial killer.
Who do you shoot? The serial killer, or the guy who’s giving you bad vibes?
First: that last comment I made was to LTV
Second: Better the devil you can see rather than the devil you can’t
I’d prefer to stab in the dark because,
If I’m right we’ll have 3/4 mafians dead (because we’ll kill LTV at some point) leaving only one unknown mafia member
If we go you’re route, regardless of wether I’m right or wrong about you, we have 2/4 mafians dead leaving 2 unknown mafia members.
Or we can kill LVT now, and get another suspect list to work with and compare it to today’s list.
If we leave LTV, the mafia will just choose him to kill tomorrow, and they’ll get a free suspect list. If we kill LTV now, they have to choose someone new to be the killer and be put on the next list.
Hard to refute such reasoning. But, out of this current suspect list, who do you believe is the killer?
Additionally, comparisons of suspect lists rarely works.
One final thing before I end this discussion
It would be very easy for a suspected mafian to throw a known mafian under the bus. Tie up loose ends, make oneself seem innocent. Especially after a suspicious chain of events surrounding oneself.
Indeed, it would be. That’s the risk that comes with being vocal in a game of mafia.Granted, silence also is suspicious. Pretty much anything is suspicious if it’s noticeable. That’s why I’ve been relying on facts, logic, etc.