The excessive feminisation of this character seems to be a rather odd portrayal. Maybe a slightly more humanised revamp could have worked if the proportions were good, however instead it seems more focus was made on making the MOC sexual - to the point where i don’t view it as a good revamp of the original character. Hips and legs are too wide and the body gets too thin and stretched in place.
Nothing else to talk about as nothing else about the MOC was revamped over than making the character overtly sexual. All you’ve done is give a character that didn’t need sexualisation, tons of sexualised aspects and made those the focus of the revamp…
Art is different - especially because in art you can change the proportions and actually make it look somewhat believable. If this MOC was made into art, it probably wouldn’t be allowed on the site due to the insane amount of sexualisation it has. A quick search and a very similar body can be found with Mantax here (Potentially NSFW link) though that body is noticeably better proportioned than the MOC.Heck, its like the physical representation of this (Potentially NSFW link) and that came from a NSFW site.
Note; If either link is not allowed then it’ll only prove my point further…
This is meant to be a revamp yet all it does is give the character breasts, a butt, thin waistline, hips, high heels and a size zero body. The only things this revamp changed were done for exaggerated sexualisation. As such those are the things that people talking about the MOC can speak about.
There are ways to make female MOC’s without stupidly over-exaggerated things, hence why community members get annoyed when the talents of a potentially amazing MOC’er are wasted on sexualising a character who didn’t need to be sexualised in the first place. Breasts and hips wouldn’t get so much hate if the MOC offered anything else for people to comment about - a large time the focus is intently done on the sexualised parts such as the case here.
The proportions in that actually look humanoid - I’m not sure what you are trying to say via showing it because that looks nothing like the proportions of the MOC. The only thing that vaguely resembles the MOC is the hip size, but that drawing has a stomach that matches the size while this one is a size zero skeleton.
proportions revolve around the unity of an object or person. change just one drastically enough, and it’s not even remotely similar. Compare this MOCs waist to the picture you posted. that’s drastic enough a change.
I just asked a dude at the place I’m at, he didn’t even know it was a chick. He thought it was a super armored warrior. He saw nothing sexual about it.
Update: two people, they both thought it was stupid people thought this was sexualized. So obviously we have different opinions and they’re not changing so let’s stop arguing.
Yeah, have to agree with Cal here. If Shadow_Rage’ intention was to make an overly sexualised MOC ‘for the luls’ then Tak210 taking it seriously and then complaining saying how it makes the community look bad for disliking it doesn’t fit.
I critiqued proportions along with everyone else and you turned it into ‘guys are sexists because they don’t like MOC’s with overly sexualised stuff - which is why there are no girls on the boards’
I got it from the multiple other users currently saying how overly sexualised this is and comparing it in conversations.
Hey now, haha. I’m taking all the critiques here and I fully intend to fix this MOC once I’ve acquired the parts, like I mentioned earlier in this topic.
