I doubt we’ll have an arm function, but the hip gears are definitely confirmed. Question is: how will it function for battle?
while being a cool new function I don’t think they will work as good as the gearbox for fighting and nothing can beat bashers function
1 Like
Bahahahaha Ekimu is evil…my god, I haven’t really followed TTV for a whole day and again we’ve gone into some really random story theory…this one is also probably the silliest I’ve ever heard. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here, Bionicle G2 is NOT as complex a story as people think…it’s not at all intended to be that way. Also, Ekimu is not Kevin Spacey.
Agreeing with you, as well as adding my own view.
1 Like
Are you referring to me thinking that, or are you agreeing with me that the theory doesn’t hold much ground?
The hip function needs alot of friction. otherwise we get the same thing as teridex where his body just slides to a side because of the weight of his staff
Fine, I’ll stop here because you’re a mod so you should know better than me and I think it’s really getting off-topic. But I think you misunderstood what I’m trying to say, so I’ll leave my counterargument here.
No, I’m not. But consider this, if a good guy tell you something, does that automatically make every word he says a correct fact? Even good guy can misunderstand sometimes, you know.
There’s no evidence that the villains were contacted telepathically. There’s also no concrete evidence that it’s Makuta. Did we ever see him command the villains? Did any of the villain even identify itself as Makuta’s minion? It could turn out to be some other evil mastermind, and it still won’t conflict with the plot at this moment as far as I know.
I believe it was said that Ekimu has a connection with the masks he created. That’s why he was able to communicate with the Toa. So it wouldn’t be surprising if there is a bond between him and his MoCr. That’s maybe why he could know Kulta got the mask.
As for the unity thing, it a common sense. “United we stand, divided we fall” Even if Bingzak’s said it, it would still be correct, wouldn’t it?
1 Like
Well, the magazine blurb seems to indicate that it’s his personal name (“Umarak loads his bone hunting bow”), but it’s not IMPOSSIBLE that it could be a clan name. We know so little about him, that nothing is out of the question. Umarak the Destroyer will probably just be a larger form of Umarak, though. It’d probably be too confusing to have two different characters with the same name but different titles.
His mask has Ignika vibes, and it does remind me of Ultron (in his Iron Legionnaire form from AoU) but Breez was the first thing I thought of when I saw the new image (which is funny, since the Breez helmet was the one always considered the most “BIONICLE-y” HF helmet)
2 Likes
Perhaps that cocoon is just a villager? Didn’t the book say something about LOSS taking villagers captive?
3 Likes
Did you forget what the video said? Kulta’s under Makuta’s control, and Kulta controls the skull army, thus Makuta controls the skull army in the grand scheme of things.
Apparently not for the Toa. 
As I’ve replied before, it’s Ekimu that said it, and…
Then tell me who else it could possibly be!?
2 Likes
Look.
Makuta is controlling Kulta. Kulta controls Skull Villains. Therefore, because Makuta controls Kulta, he has control over the skull villains. It’s a simple trick of logic.
1 Like
How would I know? I’m not the writer. I just show you that it’s not “absolute certainty” that it could be only Makuta.
This part is what I question. Is there any other evidence other than words of Ekimu? Action speaks louder than words, you know.
Then how do you trust that Lego is even giving us the real story without trusting them? By your logic, we shouldn’t trust Lego and disregard everything the BIONICLE story has said. Sorry, Greg, sorry Lego. Your books mean nothing, your old BIONICLE story means nothing because it’s told from Lego’s point of view. And they’re BIASED!
Plus, NO OTHER SOURCE is here. Since there isn’t ANY OTHER OPTION or source, we HAVE to assume that Makuta is the one in control.
Do you have any other source that contradicts him?
I have to trust LEGO because they are the one who create the story. But I’m saying that information regarding Makuta is told by a character that’s not omniscience (I think), without any scenes in story actually showing that action. So it still possible that the character could be mistaken.
Nope. How could I ague with that?
So in short, I think Ekimu could, but not necessarily, be wrong about Makuta is the one behind all those things, since the story didn’t show a scene of him actually doing it yet. Thus Makuta is still innocent until proven guilty IMO.
I’ll stop talking now, before the mods silence me forever. 
2 Likes
The whole story of “The Legend” has been told by a third-person narrator, so yeah, Makuta did his bad stuff alright.
“I’m afraid since the Prosecution states that an omniscient perspective is the only way to see the truth, and that The Legend upholds Makuta’s guilt with that perspective, I find Makuta guilty.”
(Plus, sources are sources. If you only have one eyewitness and nothing contradicts it, you kinda have to accept it.)
4 Likes
What? I know that Makuta did involve in the MoUP incident. I meant Makuta is controlling Kulta thing. Is there a narration for that?
While I can’t find narration for it, I think the narrator practically uses it for his narrative. Plus, really, it’s our only source. Plus, in the excerpts I’ve read of Island of Lost Masks, it does talk about Makuta being the one who controls Kulta, and was still out there.
1 Like
Man…the pics of the other Toa can’t get here fast enough…I really hope LEGO releases pics tomorrow…just because it’s a Friday. I want to see how problematic Onua’s torso really is, how his mask looks at different angles. Gali, Kopaka, Lewa, Pohatu are kind of similar in that regard, except I’m more interested in their masks and overall looks. Hopefully Onua looks awesome enough for me to really want to get him 
5 Likes
So I left for a few days and I’m so happy about all the news
1 Like