Five Nights at Freddy's series

Oh, alright. Whatever.

It’s clearly not the purple guy’s dreamscape or anything actually conclusive like that. I wanted 3 to end it. I wanted the true evil to be faced up to and pay for his actions, and then it would be over.

I don’t understand… The children moved on. The purple guy should be the only one left to suffer. Yet, the teaser images seem to suggest otherwise.

They look like some dumb… “individual”… decided to make an art installation out of what remains of the animatronics as monsters. But it wouldn’t make sense if the children aren’t there to possess them. Maybe the guy found parts of springtrap and mixed them with the other ones, and thus they are all possessed by the murderer? That would be instigating it to the max though… I found Springtrap a very suitable form for the purple guy.

Ugh. I really can’t stand trying to make actual sense of this seeing as an another installment drags out the only interesting part of the series.

When’s the next season of Ninjago coming out? I really need something to help me distance myself from FNAF until we get some solid answers.

6 Likes

It comes out…sometime in ether june or july.

There are still many things unanswered like the bite of 87 (what actually happened ?; were the animatronics tampered with ?; who bit the victim ? and who was the victim ?), what’s the deal with the golden Freddy ?, why did the spirits want to kill the night guards ?, who’s the purple guy ?, is the phone guy really dead ?, is Springtrap still alive ?
I hope that we’ll get the answers and if we won’t then I’ll be really disappointed.

4 Likes

All of which could be answered in the movie, which was revealed before FNaF 4 was.

2 Likes

But I bet the movie will be a soft reboot…or just a retelling.

3 Likes

I’m pretty sure it is a retelling.
After all most video game film adaptations are retellings of the game it is adapting.

4 Likes

more like attempted, crappy retellings

4 Likes

It would be cool, but I doubt that they would answer these questions in a movie.

Do you guys think that they will make one or four movies?

They’ll attempt to make a FNaF cinematic universe, but will end up failing horribly, and we’ll end up with only one.

5 Likes

Fair point.

So, like The Last Airbender?

4 Likes

yup. and it will probobly be rated R…

Eh, I wouldn’t bet on that.

The majority of the FNaF fans are kids, and whoever is making it, probably knows that.

2 Likes

Dude, if FNaF gets a PG rating I will laugh so hard.

Not that it’s likely whatsoever - but OMMN, that would be hilarious. XD The Internet would be overflowing with rants. And I’d be sitting there with my popcorn, enjoying it all.

No matter the rating, I doubt I’ll be allowed to see it, though.

2 Likes

Forgive this double-post, but I thought it should be it’s own since I have an idea(s) I’m proposing.

So, Seth Grahame-Smith - one of the producers for the FNaF movie - has stated that they (the producers/WB Studios) are collaborating with Cawthon “to make an insane, terrifying and weirdly adorable movie”. I want to touch on this a bit.

It really weirded me out a bit when I first read that line, because I was like, “‘Weirdly adorable’? Heck no! Give me blood and gore! Give me Foxy biting off someone’s frontal lobe and feasting on it!” I didn’t want FNaF to have anything to do with “weirdly adorable”, I wanted it to be utterly horrific. But, reading the line again has made me rethink that.

First of all, it says “insane, terrifying and weirdly adorable”. So there will be terror. Yay! There will be insanity. Yay! It’s the addition of “weirdly adorable” that was throwing me off.

But secondly, I realized something. In essence, FNaF is the story of (SPOILERS-ish) the spirits of deceased kids - whom are haunting animatronics - trying to get revenge on the one who had murdered them. Kids. Haunting robots.

So, what if… what if the movie takes it in a new direction? What if the main star is indeed a night guard who must defend himself from certain death, but the animatronics take a strange turn near the end?

“Weirdly adorable” brings to mind haunted animatronics who should, for all intents and purposes, be horrifying, but in reality you can’t help but feel adoration for them. Hence the word “adorable”. This further makes me think, what if the animatronics near the end show their human side? What if, instead of murdering the night guard, they stop, looking sorrowful and in pain, and we can hear them whispering “help us, help us”? Or, flip side - instead of killing the guard, they laugh and try to play with him. Or maybe they consider stuffing him into a suit is fun playtime.

Either way, I think that, my friends, would be quite weirdly adorable, while also eye-opening at the same time.

Now, “weirdly adorable” could indeed mean other things. It could mean that, during the day, the animatronics are simply just adorable and cute and huggable, despite their underlying horror side. It could also mean nothing, and I’m just reading into it too much.

But my main point is, “weirdly adorable” isn’t necessarily a bad thing, as many might think. It could mean a different twist to the story, or it could just be the company dramatizing everything. Whatever the case, that’s my two cents.

7 Likes

Maybe it could end up with maybe Foxy kinda wimpering in pain or something and the night guard helped him after Foxy saved him from another animatronic attacking him…I dunno…

1 Like

LOL.

Foxy being a good guy - the twist no one saw coming! (But the one everyone wanted.)

3 Likes

I just watched a video called fazbear and friends… that was a thing

3 Likes

Well it would make the fans happy with the whole “underdog” thing.