I realise, just thought you might want to wait as there are only 2 active people in this topic. Anyway, Eljay’s right handprint was on the left side of the paper. It makes no sense… Unless the fingerprints were somehow duplicated 
Eljay: What do you mean it makes no sense!? Kahi, think about it more carefully. Analyze it. Why would my right hand be on the left side of the paper?
2 Likes
He ripped it?
(Boy am I late, this story seems even better than the last one.)
1 Like
LOOK AT THE BACK OF THE NOTE
Also:
2006 is numbers.
Thus erasing fingerprints! Why would you do that to an object found at a crime scene?
1 Like
Kahi: What’s on the back of the note, Chronicler?
Chronicler: Sorry, pal. Nothing is on the back. You can see that nothing is shown through the back of the paper, as a scanner usually would do if words were written on the back.
Kahi: What if 2006 are numbers?
Varderan: Jumping to conclusions without any evidence, huh? For shame, Kahi. For shame.
Kahi: Mr. ModSquad.
Cronk: Yes?
Kahi: Let me show you something peculiar about this note.
Kahi: The page looks like it happened to be ripped.
Cronk: Don’t see where you’re going with this.
Kahi: You don’t? Well, let me explain it to you. If this page is ripped, it means there had to have been another part.
[WHERE IS THE OTHER PART OF THIS NOTE?][1]
Cronk: Er… Gee, we never actually found it at the scene, sir.
Kahi: So you submitted an incomplete piece of evidence? You do know how unlawful that is?
BANG BANG!
Venom: What’s the meaning of all this, Chronicler? You surely must have a reason for this!
Var: Your honor, the reason Chronicler doesn’t have the second piece is because the team is still investigating the scene. We just had to start the trial in the first place. However, this second piece is meaningless.
Kahi: Meaningless? Your honor, without the second piece, we can’t say whether this is suitable evidence! I really hope the prosecution isn’t using this as it’s only piece of evidence to back it up.
Var: I have so much more evidence and a testimony that will make this mean nothing.
Venom: Alright, that’s enough. Continue with the cross examination.
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ympCEo9yl_o
3 Likes
Why did they wash the scarf? That would ruin any fingerprints or evidence!
http://board.ttvpodcast.com/uploads/db5640/original/3X/e/e/ee66b988420de580dcc8f92d0c2d2afd40debd0f.jpg
There’s some crumpled paper near the trash can, could we leave and search for the note there?
When are we going to hear Viper’s version of the events?
And theres a missing part of the note… Probably whatever Eljay wrote
Looch, in the distance: YOU LOOK LIKE A DINGUS WITH THAT ON. HOW DID YOU GET THIS JOB
Wait, the pencil had prints from Invictus AND Eljay? Yet the “2006” is in Invictus’s handwriting.
A ripped scarf and a sword together does not sound irrelevant.
1 Like
Kahi: Chronicler, why did the Mod Squad wash the scarf?
Cronk: Because it was dirty, why?
Kahi: Because now you’ve just destroyed any traces of fingerprints on the scarf, you dignnut!
Cronk: Whoops. My bad.
Var: Chronicler, why haven’t we fired you yet?
(Nope. You’re currently in a trial. Can’t leave yet. Also, Viper’s version of events will be coming! Just be patient!)
Kahi: Please clarify something with me, Chronicler. Why did Eljay’s prints appear on the pencil?
Var: If you actually listened for once, you’d know they found it on Eljay when they arrested him.
Kahi: Chronicler, I don’t see how a sword and ripped scarf are irrelevant.
Chronicler: How so?
Kahi: Because one could have ripped the scarf with the sword.
Var: Ah, but you’re missing proof of that once again, Kahi. You have no proof of the sword ripping the scarf, do you? Besides, what does that have to do with the case at hand.
Kahi: Well, we’d know if SOMEBODY didn’t destroy the prints on the scarf.
Cronk: Sorry…
Eljay: Kahi, you know you can ask questions and present evidence, right? You should try it.
5 Likes
ummmmmm… this is evidince, right? I don’t get what the presenting does.
What is the damage on Invictus’s mask? Is it water damage?
3 Likes
Chronicler: Not much. Just a few bumps and scratches, really. However, we think they’re the result of him hitting his head on the river, and the water eroding the mask.
1 Like
Do you mean the river bed? It’s pretty hard to hit your head on running water.
Chronicler: Let me clarify on that. He hit his head on the rocks in the river.
Kahi: Chronicler, do you know the reason why Eljay brought this in the first place?
Chronicler: Well, I’d assume he was gonna do something to it with the sword.
Kahi: Correct. He was going to pretend to stab with for a skit for his Recap Reviews.
Varderan: Yes, and according to the police, they believe there is a connection between this set and the note.
Kahi: What?
Varderan: You should know this, Kahi. Gold Good Guy is a 2006 set, the only one actually found at the scene of the crime. Thus, it is presumed that the note is a way of telling us this connection. And since Eljay was the one with Gold Good Guy and the only one with Eljay, they believe Eljay murdered him. I have a witness to testify this, as well.
Kahi: (Hm. Something isn’t right. Wasn’t there another 2006 set at the scene of the crime? I dunno. I can’t remember…)
3 Likes
Throw Zaktan at the judge
2 Likes
Zaktan was released in 2006, and he was at the scene too.
That makes Viper just as much of a suspect as Eljay.
Also, I think we should check which is Eljay’s dominant hand, for the sword, pencil, pen, and note.
2 Likes
*Rubs hands together
“Release the Zaktan!”
3 Likes
Zaktan! What if the note is about Zaktan!
Kahi: Varderan, what you just said was totally wrong. There was another 2006 set found at the scene of the crime.
Varderan: What? But it’s not in the evidence.
Kahi: That’s because I have it right here:
Varderan: …
Cronk: Oh, that’s right! I remember seeing that. However, I guess you picked it up instead, huh?
Kahi: You know what this means?
THAT WE MAY HAVE ANOTHER SUSPECT WHO MURDERED INVICTUS!
CHRONICLER! YOOOOOUUUU’REE FIIIIIIRREEEEEEED!
#BANG BANG BANG!
Venom: Calm yourself down, Var. It was a simple mistake-
Kahi: You’re honor, it isn’t a mistake. It’s an entire hole in the Prosecution’s statement! This means that someone else could have murdered Invictus! Eljay or another suspect who had their grubby hands all over this!
Venom: Indeed. This means Eljay perhaps isn’t the only person who murdered Invictus!
Varderan: But the note and the pencil, your honor! Eljay forced him to write that note!
Kahi: All baseless conjecture, Varderan! Where is your proof that he forced him to write it! Perhaps he gave Invi a piece of paper and a pencil in order to write a crucial note.
Var: Ergh… Hm. Fine. You made your point. However, the question remains: why would Eljay rip the paper, then?
2 Likes
maybe he didn’t rip the paper? (sorry if that was stated already, I don’t remember)
or, maybe he was trying to get the note away from someone for unknown reasons