It looks more like quake beast and skull basher had a really awkwardly built baby. The way the shoulders connect to the body is super flimsy and gappy, and those parts will crack soon if used in such a way. And the legs aren’t good at all, there’s having custom limbs for complexity and better looks and then having custom limbs for the sake of having custom limbs.
This is not a dragon.
This looks like you took Quake beast and Skull basher, combined them, slapped really poorly constructed wings on the back and called it a dragon.
To be fair, he called it a “dragon-humanoid-thing”, though I agree that it looks kinda haphazard. With more time and effort though I can definitely see this becoming something cool
Wyvrens are sometimes considered a subspecies, sometimes not even that, just a synonym.
Rarely they are completely different, and I mean so rarely that this is the first time I’ve encountered it.
Pretty much everywhere, I’ve found that Wyvrens are but a subspecies. I’d also like to see what game/movie/book you’re referencing for this.
I’m gonna take Google’s side, since these definitions are official and everything…
@General_Hutani for reference how about the actual mythology, as for major differences
they can’t breath fire
body structure: wyvern’s have a more serpent like build, and they only have 4 limbs 2 legs and 2 wings while dragons have six, 4 legs and 2 wings
there way their mind works, dragons are a lot more cultured mind can speak and are exceptionally greedy, wyverns can’t speak, have no want for gold, and are incredibly primal
yes, they are but again they follow a different definition, if we were following the definition set by Europe(which is what we’ve been discussing) then they wouldn’t be