Protectors remaining nameless for a reason?

[quote=“ToaOfWaffles, post:19, topic:4728”]
Using the Turaga names would be lazy and ruin the purpose of a reboot since every character has the same name.
[/quote]Incorrect

[quote=“ToaOfWaffles, post:19, topic:4728”]
I believe LEGO has stated that the Toa names and Makuta are most likely the only G1 names that are being brought back.
[/quote]Correct

2 Likes

Looking back on this now, I’m guessing that for general fans the protectors can be nameless to avoid confusion, but they are named in the books for those who want to get in depth. That way they can avoid over saturating the line with complex names for the general public, while giving others the chance to get into the culture if they so choose.

3 Likes

well, seems like chronicler was right XD

3 Likes

iS all the relevancy of this topic lost?

Pretty much. :stuck_out_tongue:

I should probably close it, since now we have the names.

1 Like

There are a few of these that ask questions that are now completely irrelivent because they have answers that have been out for months

1 Like

This topic is now closed. New replies are no longer allowed.

(Question basically answered. We have names for the Protectors now.)

5 Likes