THE ELITE SIX (BIONICLE Canon Contest #3: Honor Guard, part 2)

do you have any ideas on how to improve them then?

1 Like

Yea that’s what the putting it out of its misery part means

7 Likes

Agreed, this is some nonsense, in two months no one told me “hey man there is this issue” I was one of the few that finished before the original deadline this is really unfair.

7 Likes

In the interest of being constructive, I will point out that, per the rules, the shields can be attached to the Toa’s back. That would likely be the easiest way to have them shown without having to massively redraw the piece.

10 Likes

To add to my fellow auditor’s response, the reason why you were not notified before is quite simple - the auditing process only started recently for all of the entries. All entrants are being handled fairly and equally under the same rules. The omission of shields breaks the following rule:

4e. Artwork cannot significantly modify the aesthetics of the original MOC, either by omission or addition, and must follow the color scheme of the original MOC as closely as possible. For example, additional limbs or significant color shifts would not be allowed.

6 Likes

Per TheJerminator’s response to Blue’s entry:

I have to ask, why ask for Iruini to be fixed as well when Blue was not asked to fix either Iruini or Norik, even though neither of their shields are shown there? If it is because Norik and Iruini are not an issue, then why ask for it of B3njix? If it is because they could still be holding their shields in their other hands, which are out of frame, can’t the same be said of B3njix’s Kualus here?

5 Likes

I thought we were judging the mocs here not iruini or norik, since you know they are not MOCS. I remember the rules especifically said somewhere that artwork did not had to be full body renders, that is why I didn‘t include kualus’s left arm, and we already know how the shield looks anyway

1 Like

I have seen other Art Entries where limbs and entire chunks of the MOCs have been blocked due to the positioning of characters in a scene or due to background details/objects and yet they haven’t been called out. Would that be considered an omission of parts in that case? The Artist here is not intentionally omitting parts of the MOC in order to significantly alter the aesthetic. It is simply the way the artwork was composed.

8 Likes

Not all entries are being notified at the same time, so if there are some entries which you think need some adjustments, it is quite possible they will be notified eventually.

1 Like

It’s the same shield as the others, how is this even omitting a detail? any person would be able to tell what kualus’ shield looks like from context clues.

Not to mention the fact that this art doesn’t show them from the knees down, arguably a far greater ommission, so why is the shield an issue if the legs aren’t?

Who are these rules for?

8 Likes

If you look at the rules it says:
“ We encourage entrants to illustrate full-body renders of the group, however it will not be mandated.”

So what has that suddenly change? Am I going to get the hammer because I didn‘t show their legs? In that case many entries should be desqualified.

6 Likes

Explanations of the other decisions are coming, but we want to make it clear right now that the legs are not an issue.

5 Likes

Wasn’t the point of including Norik and Iruini only so we could have a full team photo to put on the “Toa Hagah” wiki page? So why do they need to be ‘fully equipped’? They’re just there as team filler, we aren’t canonizing them.

7 Likes

While we’re regretful you weren’t advised earlier, the way things stand now is that you are being notified. If you need an extension, we can look into one. You’re also not being requested to add full shields to these characters, just indications that they exist on them (like you already do with Norik, Gaaki, and Bomonga). A shield showing through on Iruini’s back, or part of one on Kualus’ arm would be fine.

So while we apologize for the delay in notification, that’s really about it. It’s unfortunate that it took so long, but we’re here now and we’re making this request so your entry can move forward.

Imagine for a moment that we’re canonizing an image of the Toa Mata, and Gali is illustrated without her hooks. Gali has hooks, but the image doesn’t show them. That’s the situation that is attempting to be avoided.

13 Likes

So no word yet on this?

You did sort of answer the first part, affirming that it is an issue and should be corrected, which I understand and somewhat agree with, but then Blue should have to correct it too. That is, again, unless it is exempt due to being out of frame, but in that case, B3njix shouldn’t have to fix Kualus because its the exact same situation.

EDIT: As you also said, a shield could simply be added to their backs, so I don’t see how having their hands out of frame would be a valid exemption, so there is no reason Blue shouldn’t have to fix Norik and Iruini, if the ruling on B3njix’s entry is the standard. That should be corrected on the response to Blue.

2 Likes

I’ve had a second response telling me to fix Iruini only.

Given this is a topic of apparent debate, I await a final say.

Looking at the topic, whatever is being requested by anyone with the custom title “Canon Contest Entry Auditor” are official requests.

I just want to know when they’re done making requests.

3 Likes

The debate is over. This is the final say regarding the shields. All shields need to be at least partially visible.

1 Like

Alright, I really want to get this thing over with, I understand there have been many problems during this contest, so I will make the corrections requested on the following days.

5 Likes