I’m the nth person to ask about that lego designer jazz, it’s pretty fishy
listen fam, i’m a victim of lack of parts as well, but like
wayyy more effort is necessary for these guys
there are good ideas here, but they’re buried by the bad stuff
order parts on bricklink, polish up these dudes, and you may actually have something good here
but like
what we have right now just isn’t good
i’d say ekimu is the worst out of all of these, he’s a complete mess, followed by pohatu and makutie
grelnoc is the best out of the bunch but he’s still pretty generic
I and one other person helped out on this project, for only three people working on this i think we didn’t do to bad at least its in the ball park of what Lego would have done. Personally i take all the feedback as constructive and useful but some of it seems as if their going after dragologer and hating on him.
I myself use the criticism as motivation and want to do better. Can i link stuff on here or is that against the rules. (have’t been on here for a long time and need to brush up on rules)
Yeah, there should have been a clear statement of who the contributors were at the start.
Yeah, we’re going to keep “going after” Dragologer if you guys are operating off of “constructive criticism” as the definition of “hating on” someone.
Just to be clear, let’s avoid giving @dragologer or @ThelegoCCBSbuilder1 unnecessary crap. Clearly, there was some effort placed in this project, and everyone deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt.
I didn’t want to be recognized. I also seriously have been giving some thoughts on some of the things that people have said. This was dragologer’s project he came up with ideas and story basically everything, all i did was build the sets.
I understand what you’re saying @ThelegoCCBSbuilder1, but I do want to point out that it isn’t really a good sign when people aren’t credited for their work. I get that you didn’t want to be credited, but the issue of credit is an ongoing struggle on the internet. Some people were suspicious of Dragologer, as it seemed like he was trying to take credit for someone else’s work.
As for criticism, the only kind of criticism in this thread I see is constructive. No one is hating on Dragologer at all. He simply sees it that way, as he thinks all negative criticism, including constructive criticism, is spiteful and vitriolic, and to be ignored. And I do understand he says he doesn’t see constructive criticism as negative, he has not behaved that way. As the adage goes, show, don’t tell.