Kahi Nuva: Ace Attorney: Podcasts for All - An Interactive Adventure

[Dragon_Ben]

@Chronicler

In reality, I know I saw Purple have her hands on the sword. The evidence proves it. I saw her raise the sword against the man. I could not identify him. But she was about to attack him! I know it wasn’t Plural because I saw his head past the desk.

So she may of only had the sword to defend herself.

[Baldric]

I don’t think this is a lie, she said Prpl was about to attack, not that she actually did attack him.

[Chronicler]

@GIF.Man.Ben

So she may of only had the sword to defend herself.

Kahi: So this was self-defense, then.

Eljay: Why would she need self-defense?

Kahi: The attacker must’ve broken into the house.

Eljay: How did the attacker rip of the head then?

[Baldric]

Question for Cronk, was there a DNA analysis when we were bringing Viper in?

[Chronicler]

@Baldric

Has there been any DNA tests on plural or his mask?

Eljay: There has been and we found nothing.

[TheStormKing]

Prpl picked up the sword, the killer broke in and took it and then killed Plural

There was no DNA test on his body as we proved earlier with the anatomy, so we couldn’t find out who gave Plural the bruises

Edited for Double Post.
~Chronicler

[Dragon_Ben]

@Chronicler

There has been and we found nothing.

Yeah there’s something wrong with that a bite mark would have DNA on it. Hmm I wonder…

[Chronicler]

@DiamondKing

Prpl picked up the sword, the killer broke in and took it and then killed Plural

Eljay: Ah! But the only person who wielded the sword was Prpldragon, not an attacker! So how could that work?

[TheStormKing]

It said it had Prpl’s DNA, that doesn’t mean it can’t have someone elses

[Baldric]

Was the DNA testing done in between when when we brought Viper to the stand?

@DiamondKing In Ace Atorney games, the evidence does not lie, it was only Prpl’s dna on the sword.

[Dragon_Ben]

@Chronicler

Ah! But the only person who wielded the sword was Prpldragon, not an attacker! So how could that work?

I think he may of just did it with his bear hands.

@DiamondKing

that doesn’t mean it can’t have someone elses

The attacker could’ve been wearing gloves.

[TheStormKing]

Before he stated they hadn’t done a DNA of Plural’s body. Something is out of place

[Chronicler]

@DiamondKing

It said it had Prpl’s DNA, that doesn’t mean it can’t have someone elses

Eljay: Not according to our records. The only person who held it was Prpl.

@Baldric

Was the DNA testing done in between when when we brought Viper to the stand?

Eljay: Before.

@GIF.Man.Ben

The attacker could’ve been wearing gloves.

Eljay: YOU have no evidence for that!

[TheStormKing]

Before you said you hadn’t done a DNA test of Plural’s body, so that is a lie

[Dragon_Ben]

@Chronicler

YOU have no evidence for that!

We don’t, but we also know someone else was there. which could mean another suspect.

[Chronicler]

@DiamondKing

Before you said you hadn’t done a DNA test of Plural’s body, so that is a lie

Venom: Ugh. Can we give it a rest already? It’s obvious that the evidence is not complete for Plural, but if Eljay says it is for the sword then it is. That’s my final word, no more questioning of it! Unless you WANT a penalty?

[Baldric]

He just said they did it before Viper was brought up.

If what Viper says is true and Prpl was not attacking Plural, the only one who could have given Plural the bruising would be the other assailant, are there any other witnesses Eljay?.

[Chronicler]

@Baldric

If what Viper says is true and Prpl was not attacking Plural, the only one who could have given Plural the bruising would be the other assailant.

Eljay: Okay. If you’re so smart, then who WAS the assailant? And you’d better gosh-darn prove it.

[PekekoaOfJungle]

@Chronicler

who WAS the assailant? And you’d better gosh-darn prove it.

Why don’t we ask Prpl?

[TheStormKing]

Yes let’s do this