Itâs Ghost Crawler!
Also, that green Pohatu claw tail tho.
1 Like
Didnât the initial 2015 leaks come form 4chan?
1 Like
The Pohatu claw on his tail is instant proof this is fake.
@MiraculousPrime Bruh i know but this just seemed super legit. Trust me Iâve seen some FAAAAAAAKE stuff while browsing on 4chan but this seemed too real to pass up.
@Patriotic_Nerd Why? There are some old 2003 parts that came with the new toa (rahkshi staff spear thingy on Pohatu and Kopaka)
@Toa_Straya âŚwhyy??
@Willess12 where do you see the HF 2.0 chestplate? I dont see it
@Toa_Straya thatâs legitimate, but remember that when we got the first preliminary pictures for the first wave, they had the ignika on them soâŚidk 
also, this (if itâs real) is preliminary so the box art wouldnât be finalized yetâŚ? Idk iâm really trying to be optimistic XD
@Patriotic_Nerd You make some good points, my friend. I see what youâre calling âgreenscreen linesâ but I think thatâs supposed to be a glowâŚIf you look at the box arts for some of the sets they have a glow around them or something. If someone faked this, that was their mistake
2 Likes
I hope not. If they did, then why did TTV call it Highly Suspect?
super fake like that one is less believable then the purple and black one we had earlier. 
thumbs up to the guy who made it though he did a good job
1 Like
that thing on the tail is not a Pohatu Nuva claw. The shape is all wrong. I donât know what it is, but itâs not a Pohatu claw.
but the HF 2.0 chest plate tells me this is fake.
Not to mention that the âsetâ is way too high in the picture, leaving so much empty space down below. the name, illegible, is also out of line and clearly photoshopped on.
Ech, this is fake.
look directly beneath the tail.
Actually, it might not be a 2.0 chest piece. Hard to tell, now that I look again.
still say itâs fake.
Hmm⌠good pointâŚ
3 Likes
the thing that really gave it away for me is the lighting. while the rest of the background is hazy and sort of gloomy the actual set is lighted up like a Christmas decoration. also its body peices dont it with the background (like its standing on mid air) and you can see the lines where it has been green screened. other thing is that bionicle will most likely not be using the mask of creation as its cover mask next year.
1 Like
The name of the set is struck out.
The âsetâ has an edge around it where it was crappily cut and pasted onto the background. You can see the greenscreening. Using a greenscreen was an utterly bad choice for a green MOC.
The âsetâ is to big and complex to be an actual Lego set sold in that size of box. It would be in a box sized like Skull Grinderâs and Ekimuâs box.
The piece count on the box says something like 83 or 93 pieces. That "set has alot more pieces than that. Tahu Master of Fire has 89 pieces. This âsetâ has way more pieces than that.
Nobody has a camera that would be that crappy, and they would never take a picture at that angle, cutting off the item number.
3 Likes
Obvious photoshop/green screen effect, weird lighting, G1 moldsâŚ99.9% +0.1% sure this is fake.
@toxicmocs The Rahkahi staff was last produced in 2010âŚ
And I love how every âleakâ has the box on a tiltâit makes it seem way more legit. XD
4 Likes
âŚI donât recall this piece ever being produced 
4 Likes
@Rockho What do you mean? The ârah kahiâ staff is Kahiâs weapon of choice.
I shall not fix that typo, for it is too great. XD
6 Likes
*too great. *rahkshi
I am the commissioner of the grammar police.
2 Likes
Ok so I just did some magic internet work and found these images:
:
Not sure if the guy who made this moc is the same one who made the fakes butâŚnow we know theyâre fakes 
so much for faith heheâŚ
Pretty cool moc tho
14 Likes
the way you replied to people,
I canât follow this discussion,
in the future can you not?
2 Likes
[quote=âPayinku, post:269, topic:9971â]
n the future can you not?
[/quote] Bruh you cant double post. Iâve tried doing that before but the admins get on me about it
but you can individually reply after someone posts!
sorry for rudeness
@JMP I actually did not know that.
That will make things so much easier
youâre over-correcting.
if someone has posted after you you can make a new post,
if multiple people have replied to you since youâre last post, @/quote them in the new post.
[quote=âJMP, post:271, topic:9971â]
but you can individually reply after someone posts!
[/quote]you worded that horribly.
2 Likes
meh. itâs cause thereâs a limit to how many people you can @â
@Payinku the heck do I word it as then? I feel like itâs correct