Yes it might have more lore, but that doesn’t make it popular, having more of something doesn’t mean new fans will flock to it.
I like Bionicle’s story more, but I like Ninjago’s characters more. I don’t really know all that much about who each Toa is as a character, a symptom of my late introduction to the theme. However, I do prefer my favorite Bionicle character to my favorite Ninjago character.
how dare you
2 Likes
I was never arguing that, I was arguing that the more popular theme will have more support from a business perspective.
I still just don’t really know Bionicle’s characters. I mean, I know who they are, I just don’t know their personalities or stories.
before this yet again turns into a massive debate
I think building primarily with HF armour is heavily undervalued… But the true potential of the system needs the proper scale. I’m not talking about Inika builds, I’m talking about two foot sculptures.
4 Likes
It would have been awesome if they came out with more titan-sized sets, mainly as collectables.
1 Like
I think I just found my partner
Seriously, I never really understood what is bad about them.
They’re definitely useful, though I tend to use them as parts of a torso or arm
I find they’re especially good when you cover the gap with a 3 long beam.
But I do prefer the smaller claw feet, they’re just so appealing.
3 Likes
I mean, I kind of do, but I still like them.
I agree with both of these.
1 Like
Some are terrible but they’re not all bad, the Toa masters feet piece was good.
Comparing it to the earlier hero factory feet*
The original HF foot piece was terrible imo, the Toa Masters one was better, I know it was originally used earlier but I forget which set introduced it.
1 Like
the 2.0 heroes in 2011, when ccbs was first introduced
Was HF 1.0 not ccbs? My bad.
I honestly never understood what the problem is with CCBS. I always enjoyed it. Especially when mixed with Bio pieces.
I’m not sure how unpopular an opinion this is, but
X
Forever!
Edited for double post- Prentice1215
1 Like